Drilling Schedule and Multi-Well Forecasting
Overview
Real field development involves drilling wells over months or years. The drilling schedule determines when each well starts producing and directly shapes the field production profile. Multi-well aggregation combines individual well forecasts into a composite field forecast accounting for staggered start dates.
Schedule-Based Aggregation
Concept
Each well in the field has:
- A start date (determined by drilling schedule)
- A type curve (production profile from first production)
- Individual parameters (peak rate, decline rate, b-factor)
The field rate at any time is the sum of all active wells:
Where:
- = individual well production function
- = start date of well
- = Heaviside step function (0 before start, 1 after)
Example
▲ Rate
│
│ Well 1 Well 2 Well 3
│ ╱╲ ╱╲ ╱╲
│ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲
│ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲
│ ╱ ╲──╱──────╲──╱──────╲────
│ ╱ ╲
│ ╱ Aggregate Field Profile ╲
│ ╱ ╲
└───────────────────────────────────────────────▶ Time
t1 t2 t3
Drilling Schedule Parameters
Key Inputs
| Parameter | Description | Typical Range |
|---|---|---|
| Total well count | Number of development wells | 5-500+ |
| Rig count | Number of drilling rigs | 1-10 |
| Drilling time | Days per well (spud to completion) | 15-120 days |
| Cycle time | Total time between well starts | 20-180 days |
| Well spacing | Time between successive well starts | Cycle time / rig count |
Buildup Rate
The buildup rate depends on how quickly wells are added:
Where is the average time between new well starts.
Cumulative Production
Field Cumulative
For practical calculations, this is evaluated using the cumulative function of each well's decline model (Arps, modified hyperbolic, etc.).
EUR Estimation
Total field EUR:
Where each well's EUR is calculated from its individual decline parameters.
Type Curve Approach
Single Type Curve
The simplest approach assumes all wells follow the same type curve:
This is valid when:
- Wells target the same zone
- Completion designs are similar
- Reservoir quality is relatively uniform
Multiple Type Curves
For heterogeneous fields, wells are grouped by:
| Grouping Criterion | Example |
|---|---|
| Well location | Core vs. edge |
| Target zone | Multiple pay zones |
| Completion type | Vertical vs. horizontal |
| Reservoir quality | Good vs. marginal |
Each group gets its own type curve, and the field profile is the sum of all groups.
Practical Considerations
Plateau Constraint
When the aggregate well capacity exceeds facility capacity:
During plateau:
- Some wells may be choked back
- New wells replace declining ones
- Plateau length depends on total deliverability vs. constraint
Production Efficiency
Actual production is less than theoretical due to downtime:
Typical production efficiency: 90-97% for well-managed fields.
Infill Drilling
Later infill wells often show:
- Lower peak rates (pressure depletion)
- Steeper decline (smaller drainage area)
- Interference with existing wells
These effects should be captured in the type curves for later drilling phases.
Related Topics
- FPP Overview — Buildup-plateau-decline framework
- DCA Overview — Individual well decline models
- DCA Arps — Type curve equations for individual wells
References
Arps, J.J. (1945). "Analysis of Decline Curves." Transactions of AIME, 160, 228-247.
Towler, B.F. (2002). Fundamental Principles of Reservoir Engineering. SPE Textbook Series Vol. 8.
Dake, L.P. (2001). The Practice of Reservoir Engineering, Revised Edition. Elsevier.
Mishra, S. (2012). "A New Approach to Reserves Estimation Using Field Production Profile Analysis." SPE-159646-MS, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas.
Doublet, L.E. and Blasingame, T.A. (1996). "Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves: Analysis of Oil Well Production Data Using Material Balance Time." SPE-35731-MS.