Material Balance Overview
Introduction
Material Balance Equation (MBE) is a fundamental reservoir engineering tool that applies the conservation of mass to a petroleum reservoir. By accounting for all fluids produced, injected, and remaining in place, the MBE enables:
- Original fluids in place — estimate OOIP (oil) or OGIP (gas)
- Drive mechanism identification — depletion, gas cap, water drive, compaction
- Aquifer characterization — size and strength of water influx
- Recovery prediction — forecast reservoir performance
- History matching — validate simulation models
The MBE treats the reservoir as a single "tank" — a zero-dimensional model. Despite this simplification, it provides robust volumetric estimates when sufficient pressure and production data are available.
The General Material Balance Equation
Concept
All fluids withdrawn from the reservoir must come from:
- Expansion of oil, gas, water, and rock as pressure declines
- External influx of water from an aquifer
Reservoir Classification
Gas Reservoir Material Balance
The p/z Method
For a volumetric gas reservoir (no water influx), the MBE simplifies to:
Where:
- = pressure divided by gas compressibility factor
- = original gas in place (OGIP)
- = cumulative gas production
A plot of vs. yields a straight line:
- Y-intercept = (known)
- X-intercept = (OGIP)
Modified p/z for Geopressured Reservoirs
Abnormally pressured reservoirs require correction for water and rock compressibility:
Where incorporates formation and water compressibility terms.
📖 Full Documentation: Gas Reservoirs
Oil Reservoir Material Balance
Havlena-Odeh Straight-Line Method
The general oil MBE is rearranged into linear forms for graphical interpretation:
Where:
- = underground withdrawal (production voidage)
- = original oil in place (OOIP)
- = oil and dissolved gas expansion
- = gas cap expansion
- = connate water and rock expansion
- = gas cap ratio ()
- = cumulative water influx
Expansion Terms
| Term | Expression | Physical Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Oil + dissolved gas expansion | ||
| Gas cap expansion | ||
| Water + rock expansion |
Underground Withdrawal
📖 Full Documentation: Oil Reservoirs
Drive Mechanism Identification
Drive Indices
The relative contribution of each drive mechanism is quantified by drive indices:
| Index | Symbol | Expression |
|---|---|---|
| Depletion Drive | DDI | |
| Gas Cap Drive | GDI | |
| Water Drive | WDI | |
| Compaction Drive | CDI |
The sum of all drive indices equals 1.0 at each time step:
Interpretation
| Dominant Drive | Typical DDI | Pressure Behavior | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solution gas | > 0.8 | Rapid decline | 5-25% |
| Gas cap | > 0.3 | Moderate decline | 20-40% |
| Water drive | > 0.5 | Slow decline, near constant | 35-75% |
| Compaction | > 0.3 | Slow decline | 15-40% |
Aquifer Models
Water influx from an aquifer is the most uncertain term in the MBE. Several models with increasing complexity are available:
| Model | Type | Assumptions | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pot | Simple tank | Finite, instant response | Small, active aquifers |
| Schilthuis | Steady-state | Constant influx rate per psi | Moderate aquifers |
| Fetkovich | Pseudo-steady-state | Finite aquifer, declining influx | Most field applications |
| Van Everdingen-Hurst | Unsteady-state | Rigorous diffusivity solution | Large, complex aquifers |
📖 Full Documentation: Aquifer Models
MBE Workflow
Step-by-Step Analysis
Available Calculations
Gas MBE
| Function Category | Description |
|---|---|
| p/z and modified p/z | Standard and geopressured methods |
| OGIP estimation | From p/z analysis |
| Pressure prediction | Forecast pressure at given cumulative production |
| Recovery factor | Ultimate recovery calculation |
Oil MBE
| Function Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Havlena-Odeh | OOIP estimation (single-point and regression) |
| Expansion terms | , , , , |
| Underground withdrawal | for oil and gas reservoirs |
| Drive indices | DDI, GDI, WDI, CDI |
Aquifer Models
| Function Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Pot aquifer | Volume and cumulative influx |
| Schilthuis | Influx rate and cumulative |
| Fetkovich | Aquifer properties, pressure, rate, cumulative |
| Van Everdingen-Hurst | Dimensionless influx functions |
📖 Full Documentation: Underground Withdrawal
Best Practices
Data Quality
- Pressure data must be average reservoir pressure (not flowing pressure)
- Use shut-in pressures or correct for pressure gradients
- Consistent PVT — use the same correlations throughout
- Account for all production — oil, gas, and water
Common Pitfalls
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| N varies with time | Wrong drive mechanism assumed | Re-evaluate m or We |
| N is negative | Aquifer overestimated | Reduce aquifer size |
| Early data scatter | Pressure measurement errors | Weight later data more |
| Non-linear p/z plot | Water influx present in gas reservoir | Use gas MBE with We |
Related Documentation
MBE Details
- Gas Reservoirs — p/z method and geopressured corrections
- Oil Reservoirs — Havlena-Odeh straight-line analysis
- Aquifer Models — Pot, Schilthuis, VEH, Fetkovich
- Underground Withdrawal — Calculating F and expansion terms
Supporting Topics
- PVT Overview — Fluid properties needed for MBE
- PTA Overview — Average reservoir pressure from well tests
References
Havlena, D. and Odeh, A.S. (1963). "The Material Balance as an Equation of a Straight Line." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15(8), 896-900. SPE-559-PA.
Havlena, D. and Odeh, A.S. (1964). "The Material Balance as an Equation of a Straight Line — Part II, Field Cases." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 16(7), 815-822. SPE-869-PA.
Dake, L.P. (1978). Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier.
Ahmed, T. (2019). Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing.
Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M.F. (1991). Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall.