Peng-Robinson Equation of State
Overview
The Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR76) was published in 1976 and quickly became the most widely used cubic EoS in the petroleum industry. It provides improved liquid density predictions compared to the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation while maintaining computational simplicity.
The PR Equation
Pure Component Form
Where:
- = pressure
- = temperature
- = molar volume
- = universal gas constant
Parameters
Co-volume parameter:
Attraction parameter at critical temperature:
Temperature-dependent attraction:
Alpha Function (Soave-type)
Where is the reduced temperature, and:
For heavier components (), the Graboski-Daubert modification is recommended:
Cubic Form
Rewriting in terms of the compressibility factor :
Where:
This cubic equation has either one or three real roots:
| Phase | Root Selection |
|---|---|
| Vapor | Largest real root |
| Liquid | Smallest positive real root (must satisfy ) |
| Single phase | Only one valid root exists |
Mixing Rules
Van der Waals One-Fluid Mixing Rules
For mixtures of components with mole fractions :
Attraction parameter:
Co-volume parameter:
Binary Interaction Parameters
The values correct for non-ideal mixing. They are symmetric () and .
| Component Pair | Typical Range |
|---|---|
| CH4 - C2H6 | 0.000 - 0.005 |
| CH4 - C3H8 | 0.005 - 0.015 |
| CH4 - nC10 | 0.04 - 0.05 |
| CO2 - CH4 | 0.10 - 0.13 |
| CO2 - nC4 | 0.13 - 0.15 |
| N2 - CH4 | 0.02 - 0.04 |
| N2 - CO2 | -0.02 |
| H2S - CH4 | 0.08 |
| H2S - CO2 | 0.10 |
Derived Properties
Fugacity Coefficient
For component in a mixture:
Molar Volume
Density
Where is the mixture molecular weight:
Volume Translation
The PR equation systematically underestimates liquid densities by 3-5%. The Peneloux volume translation corrects this:
Where is a component-specific shift parameter. Volume translation improves density without affecting phase equilibrium calculations (fugacity ratios are unchanged).
Applicability and Limitations
Strengths
- Best liquid density among two-parameter cubic EoS
- Accurate vapor pressure predictions for hydrocarbons
- Well-suited for petroleum reservoir fluids
- Robust convergence properties
Limitations
| Limitation | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid density bias (-3 to -5%) | Underpredicts oil density | Apply volume translation |
| Poor near critical point | Large errors at | Use higher-order EoS |
| Polar compounds | Inaccurate for water, alcohols | Use specialized models |
| Heavy components () | Requires good characterization | Tune C7+ properties |
Valid Ranges
| Parameter | Practical Range |
|---|---|
| Temperature | 100-800 K |
| Pressure | 1-10,000 psia |
| Components | Hydrocarbons C1-C45, CO2, N2, H2S |
| Acentric factor | 0 - 1.5 |
Related Topics
- EoS Overview — When to use EoS vs. correlations
- Flash Calculations — Phase equilibrium using PR
- Phase Envelope — Bubble/dew point curves
- C7+ Characterization — Heavy fraction modeling
References
Peng, D.Y. and Robinson, D.B. (1976). "A New Two-Constant Equation of State." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 15(1), 59-64.
Robinson, D.B. and Peng, D.Y. (1978). "The Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng-Robinson Programs." GPA Research Report RR-28.
Peneloux, A., Rauzy, E., and Freze, R. (1982). "A Consistent Correction for Redlich-Kwong-Soave Volumes." Fluid Phase Equilibria, 8(1), 7-23.
Graboski, M.S. and Daubert, T.E. (1978). "A Modified Soave Equation of State for Phase Equilibrium Calculations." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 17(4), 443-448.
Whitson, C.H. and Brule, M.R. (2000). Phase Behavior. SPE Monograph Vol. 20.