Pressure Transient Analysis Overview

Introduction

Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) uses pressure response measurements during flow rate changes to characterize reservoir and well properties. By analyzing how pressure propagates through the formation, engineers can determine:

  • Permeability — formation flow capacity
  • Skin factor — near-wellbore damage or stimulation
  • Reservoir boundaries — faults, aquifers, drainage limits
  • Drainage area — connected pore volume
  • Formation pressure — initial and average reservoir pressure

Petroleum Office provides analytical solutions for well testing interpretation based on the diffusivity equation.

Fundamental Concepts

The Diffusivity Equation

All PTA solutions derive from the diffusivity equation for slightly compressible fluid flow:

2pr2+1rpr=ϕμctkpt\frac{\partial^2 p}{\partial r^2} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial p}{\partial r} = \frac{\phi \mu c_t}{k} \frac{\partial p}{\partial t}

This equation describes how pressure disturbances propagate radially from a wellbore through a porous medium.

Dimensionless Variables

Working in dimensionless form simplifies analysis and enables type curve matching:

Variable Definition Physical Meaning
pDp_D kh(pip)141.2qBμ\frac{kh(p_i - p)}{141.2 q B \mu} Normalized pressure drop
tDt_D 0.0002637ktϕμctrw2\frac{0.0002637 k t}{\phi \mu c_t r_w^2} Normalized time
rDr_D r/rwr / r_w Normalized radial distance
CDC_D 0.8936Cϕcthrw2\frac{0.8936 C}{\phi c_t h r_w^2} Normalized wellbore storage

📖 Full Documentation: Dimensionless Variables


Model Selection Framework

Decision Tree

Loading diagram...

Quick Reference Table

Scenario Early Time Middle Time Late Time Model
Ideal infinite - Radial flow Continues Line Source
With storage/skin Unit slope Radial flow Continues VW with S, C
Single fault - Radial → doubled slope Doubled slope Linear sealing
Channel - Radial → linear Linear flow Parallel boundaries
Closed - Radial → PSS PSS decline Bounded rectangle

Available PTA Models

Infinite-Acting Reservoir

The fundamental solution for a well in an infinite homogeneous reservoir.

Line Source Solution:

pD(rD,tD)=12Ei(rD24tD)p_D(r_D, t_D) = -\frac{1}{2} \text{Ei}\left(-\frac{r_D^2}{4t_D}\right)

At the Wellbore (with skin and storage): Solutions use Laplace transform and Stehfest numerical inversion.

Diagnostic Features:

  • Semi-log straight line after wellbore effects
  • Slope gives permeability-thickness (kh)
  • Intercept gives skin factor

📖 Full Documentation: Infinite Reservoir Solution


Bounded Reservoir

Real reservoirs have boundaries that affect pressure behavior. The method of images handles various boundary configurations.

Boundary Types:

Type Physical Example Pressure Effect
Sealing fault Impermeable barrier Pressure drops faster
Constant pressure Aquifer, gas cap Pressure stabilizes
Mixed Fault + aquifer Combined effects

Configurations:

  • Linear fault — Single sealing boundary
  • Perpendicular faults — Corner (90°)
  • Parallel faults — Channel geometry
  • Constant pressure boundaries — Pressure support

📖 Full Documentation: Bounded Reservoir Models


Flow Regime Identification

Diagnostic Plot Features

The log-log diagnostic plot (pressure change and derivative vs. time) reveals flow regimes:

log(Δp), log(Δp')
      │
      │    ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●          Derivative plateau = radial flow
      │   ●
      │  ●                          
      │ ●    Transition from        
      │●     wellbore storage       
      │●●●●●                        Unit slope = wellbore storage
      │
      └─────────────────────────→ log(Δt)
Derivative Signature Flow Regime Indicates
Unit slope (45°) Wellbore storage Early-time storage effects
Horizontal plateau Radial flow Infinite-acting period
Half slope (1/2) Linear flow Fracture or channel
Doubled plateau Boundary effect Sealing fault nearby
Falling derivative Constant pressure Aquifer support

Semi-Log Analysis

The Horner plot (or MDH plot for drawdown) identifies radial flow and extracts parameters:

pwf=pimlog(t)+constp_{wf} = p_i - m \log(t) + \text{const}

Where slope mm gives:

kh=162.6qBμmkh = \frac{162.6 qB\mu}{m}

Interpretation Workflow

Step 1: Data Quality Check

  1. Verify rate history accuracy
  2. Check for gauge resolution and drift
  3. Identify operational events (shut-ins, rate changes)

Step 2: Diagnostic Analysis

  1. Plot log-log diagnostic (Δp and derivative vs. Δt)
  2. Identify flow regimes from derivative shape
  3. Determine appropriate model

Step 3: Model Selection

Based on diagnostic features:

  • Infinite reservoir if derivative stabilizes
  • Bounded if derivative deviates late-time
  • Wellbore effects if early unit slope

Step 4: Parameter Estimation

  1. Semi-log analysis for kh and skin
  2. Type curve matching for verification
  3. History matching for complex cases

Step 5: Validation

  1. Check material balance (average pressure)
  2. Compare with geology/seismic
  3. Validate against production data

Key Parameters Extracted

Parameter Symbol From Significance
Permeability-thickness khkh Semi-log slope Flow capacity
Skin factor SS Semi-log intercept Wellbore condition
Wellbore storage CC Early unit slope Wellbore volume effects
Initial pressure pip_i Extrapolation Original reservoir pressure
Average pressure pˉ\bar{p} Horner extrapolation Current reservoir pressure
Distance to boundary LL Deviation time Boundary location

Function Categories

Dimensionless Pressure Functions

Calculate pDp_D for various reservoir configurations.

Real Pressure Functions

Convert dimensionless solutions to field units.

Derivative Functions

Calculate pressure derivative for diagnostic plots.

Boundary Models

Handle sealing faults, constant pressure, mixed boundaries.


Detailed Model Theory

Supporting Functions


References

  1. Lee, J., Rollins, J.B., and Spivey, J.P. (2003). Pressure Transient Testing. SPE Textbook Series Vol. 9.

  2. Bourdet, D. (2002). Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models. Elsevier.

  3. Horne, R.N. (1995). Modern Well Test Analysis: A Computer-Aided Approach, 2nd Edition. Petroway Inc.

  4. Earlougher, R.C. Jr. (1977). Advances in Well Test Analysis. SPE Monograph Vol. 5.

  5. Matthews, C.S. and Russell, D.G. (1967). Pressure Buildup and Flow Tests in Wells. SPE Monograph Vol. 1.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X