Oil Reservoir Material Balance
Overview
The Havlena-Odeh method (1963, 1964) transforms the general material balance equation into straight-line forms that enable graphical determination of original oil in place (OOIP), gas cap size, and water influx strength. This technique remains one of the most powerful tools in reservoir engineering for validating volumetric estimates and understanding reservoir drive mechanisms.
General Oil MBE
The Equation
Where:
- = total underground withdrawal
- = original oil in place (OOIP), STB
- = ratio of initial gas cap volume to initial oil volume
- = expansion terms
- = cumulative water influx, RB
Underground Withdrawal
This accounts for:
- Oil produced (in reservoir volumes)
- Free gas produced above solution GOR
- Water produced
Expansion Terms
| Term | Expression | Physical Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Oil + dissolved gas expansion | ||
| Free gas cap expansion | ||
| Connate water + rock expansion | ||
| Total expansion | ||
| Two-phase formation volume factor |
Straight-Line Methods
Case 1: No Gas Cap, No Water Drive ()
Plot vs. : slope = .
Case 2: Known Gas Cap, No Water Drive ( known, )
Plot vs. : slope = .
Case 3: No Gas Cap, Water Drive ( unknown)
This is the Campbell plot: plot vs. :
- Slope = 1
- Y-intercept =
Case 4: Unknown Gas Cap and Water Drive ( and unknown)
Plot vs. :
- Y-intercept =
- Slope = →
Diagnostic Plots
F vs. Et (No Aquifer)
- Straight line through origin = correct model
- Curve upward = water influx present (We > 0)
- Scatter = PVT or pressure data errors
F/Et vs. Time (Campbell Plot)
- Horizontal line = correct N, no aquifer
- Rising trend = water influx — N is underestimated without We
- Falling trend = N overestimated or m wrong
Drive Index Plot
Plot DDI, GDI, WDI, CDI vs. time:
- Shows how drive mechanisms evolve
- All indices must sum to 1.0 at each point
- Helps identify the dominant recovery mechanism
Practical Considerations
Data Requirements
| Data | Source | Quality Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Average reservoir pressure | Buildup tests | Must be average, not flowing |
| Cumulative oil production | Production records | Usually reliable |
| Cumulative gas production | Gas metering | Often uncertain |
| Cumulative water production | Water handling records | Can be estimated |
| PVT properties | Lab or correlations | Consistency critical |
| ratio | Volumetric or log data | Often uncertain |
When MBE Works Best
- Significant pressure decline — at least 10-15% of initial pressure
- Multiple pressure surveys — 5+ data points minimum
- Reliable production data — metered oil, gas, and water
- Known PVT — lab data or well-calibrated correlations
When MBE Fails
| Problem | Symptom | Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient depletion | Scatter, no trend | Not enough pressure change |
| Poor pressure data | Non-straight lines | Inaccurate average pressure |
| Wrong PVT | Inconsistent N values | Bad fluid properties |
| Compartmentalization | Multiple trends | Not a single tank reservoir |
Related Topics
- MBE Overview — Context and workflow for material balance
- Gas Reservoirs — p/z method for gas reservoirs
- Aquifer Models — Water influx calculation methods
- Underground Withdrawal — Calculating F and expansion terms
References
Havlena, D. and Odeh, A.S. (1963). "The Material Balance as an Equation of a Straight Line." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15(8), 896-900. SPE-559-PA.
Havlena, D. and Odeh, A.S. (1964). "The Material Balance as an Equation of a Straight Line — Part II, Field Cases." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 16(7), 815-822. SPE-869-PA.
Dake, L.P. (1978). Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Chapter 3.
Ahmed, T. (2019). Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing.
Campbell, R.A. (1978). Mineral Property Economics, Volume 3: Petroleum Property Evaluation. Campbell Petroleum Series.