Horizontal Well Productivity
Overview
Horizontal wells offer significant advantages over vertical wells:
- Larger contact area with reservoir
- Lower drawdown for same production rate
- Delayed water/gas breakthrough
- Better drainage of thin, layered reservoirs
- Access to naturally fractured reservoirs
Horizontal well productivity is governed by:
- Horizontal permeability (kh) — Flow perpendicular to wellbore
- Vertical permeability (kv) — Flow from above/below wellbore
- Anisotropy ratio (kv/kh) — Critical parameter
- Well length (L) — Longer = higher productivity
- Reservoir thickness (h) — Thin reservoirs benefit most
- Wellbore position (zw) — Vertical placement in pay zone
Productivity Index Correlations
Five major correlations are implemented, each with specific advantages:
| Correlation | Year | Best For | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joshi | 1988 | General purpose | Anisotropic, any well position |
| Borisov | 1984 | Isotropic reservoirs | Simplest, kv = kh only |
| Giger-Reiss-Jourdan (GRJ) | 1985 | Anisotropic, long wells | Elliptical drainage |
| Renard-Dupuy (RD) | 1991 | Box-shaped drainage | Rectangular reservoirs |
| Babu-Odeh (BO) | 1989 | Any well position | Most general, complex |
Joshi Method (1988)
Productivity Index
Where:
Parameters:
- = horizontal well length, ft
- = reservoir thickness, ft
- = drainage radius in horizontal plane, ft
- = wellbore radius, ft
- = horizontal permeability, md
- = vertical permeability, md
- = skin factor
Physical interpretation:
- First term: horizontal drainage (major contribution)
- Second term: vertical drainage correction
- Accounts for anisotropy (kv ≠ kh)
Drainage Area
Joshi provides two methods:
Method 1 (Ellipse):
Where:
Method 2 (Rectangle with rounded ends):
Where W = drainage width.
Typical values:
- L = 2000 ft, reh = 1000 ft → A ≈ 10-15 acres
Borisov Method (1984)
Productivity Index (Isotropic: kv = kh)
Where:
- Assumes isotropic reservoir (kv = kh = k)
- Simplest correlation
- re = equivalent circular drainage radius
When to use: Sandstone with uniform permeability in all directions.
Limitation: Cannot handle anisotropy (most reservoirs are anisotropic!).
Giger-Reiss-Jourdan (GRJ) Method (1985)
Productivity Index
Where:
Features:
- Elliptical drainage assumption
- Accounts for anisotropy via
- Good for long horizontal wells (L > 1000 ft)
Renard-Dupuy (RD) Method (1991)
Productivity Index
Where:
Features:
- Rectangular drainage (box-shaped)
- xe = horizontal extent of drainage
- xw = well position from edge
- Good for wells in elongated rectangular reservoirs
Babu-Odeh (BO) Method (1989)
Full General Form (BO)
Most complex but most accurate for any well position in reservoir:
Where , are shape factors depending on:
- Well location (xw, yw, zw) relative to drainage boundaries
- Anisotropy ratio (kv/kh)
- Drainage shape (xe, ye, h)
Function: ProdIndexHorWellBO — Full positioning
Simplified Form (BO2 — Centered Well)
For well centered in reservoir (xw = xe/2, yw = ye/2):
Where C₁, C₂, C₃ are correlation constants.
Function: ProdIndexHorWellBO2 — Simplified for centered wells
When to use:
- BO (full) — Well near edges or boundaries
- BO2 — Well centered, simpler calculation
Comparison of Methods
Prediction Accuracy (Relative to Numerical Simulation)
| Method | Centered Well | Near Boundary | Anisotropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joshi | Good (±15%) | Good | Excellent |
| Borisov | Fair (±25%) | Poor | Cannot handle |
| GRJ | Good (±10%) | Fair | Good |
| RD | Good (±15%) | Good | Good |
| Babu-Odeh | Excellent (±5%) | Excellent | Excellent |
Recommendation:
- General use: Joshi (widely validated, simple)
- Best accuracy: Babu-Odeh (if positioning data available)
- Quick estimate: Borisov (isotropic only)
Effect of Anisotropy
For typical carbonate (kv/kh = 0.1):
| Well Length | Joshi J | Borisov J | Error if Ignore Anisotropy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 ft | 25 STB/d/psi | 45 STB/d/psi | +80% overprediction! |
| 2000 ft | 45 STB/d/psi | 75 STB/d/psi | +67% overprediction! |
Conclusion: Must account for anisotropy in carbonates, shales, and layered reservoirs.
Drainage Area Estimation
DrainageAreaHorWell1 (Joshi Ellipse)
Where:
- = major axis (calculated from Joshi's equations)
- = minor axis
DrainageAreaHorWell2 (Joshi Rectangle)
Where W is estimated drainage width.
Use case: Well spacing design, interference analysis.
Related Documentation
- WellFlow Overview — Well performance concepts
- Productivity Index — Vertical well PI (detailed)
- Vogel IPR — Two-phase IPR (horizontal adaptation exists)
- Vertical Flow Correlations — Tubing hydraulics
References
Joshi, S.D. (1988). "Augmentation of Well Productivity with Slant and Horizontal Wells." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 40(6), pp. 729-739. SPE-15375-PA.
Borisov, J.P. (1984). Oil Production Using Horizontal and Multiple Deviation Wells. Moscow: Nedra Publishing (translated by J.Strauss, R&D Library Translation).
Giger, F.M., Reiss, L.H., and Jourdan, A.P. (1984). "The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Horizontal Drilling." SPE-13024-MS, presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference, Houston, TX, September 16-19.
Renard, G. and Dupuy, J.M. (1991). "Formation Damage Effects on Horizontal-Well Flow Efficiency." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 43(7), pp. 786-869. SPE-19414-PA.
Babu, D.K. and Odeh, A.S. (1989). "Productivity of a Horizontal Well." SPE Reservoir Engineering, 4(4), pp. 417-421. SPE-18298-PA.
Economides, M.J., Brand, C.W., and Frick, T.P. (1996). "Well Configurations in Anisotropic Reservoirs." SPE Formation Evaluation, 11(4), pp. 257-262. SPE-27980-PA.
Joshi, S.D. (1991). Horizontal Well Technology. Tulsa, OK: PennWell Publishing Company.