Multiphase Correlation Comparison


Description

Compare pressure drop predictions from all ten industry-standard multiphase flow correlations. Understanding correlation differences helps engineers select the most appropriate method for specific well conditions.

Correlations:

  • Beggs & Brill (1973): General-purpose, any inclination, most widely used
  • Gray (1974): Best for gas wells with liquid loading
  • Hagedorn & Brown (1965): Near-vertical oil wells, industry standard
  • Ansari (1994): Mechanistic TUFFP model, vertical wells
  • Hasan-Kabir (1988): Mechanistic, deviated wells and annular geometry
  • Mukherjee-Brill (1985): Improvement over Beggs-Brill for inclined wells
  • Orkiszewski (1967): Composite vertical well correlation
  • Duns & Ros (1963): High GOR gas wells
  • Aziz (1972): Drift-flux model for vertical wells
  • Poettmann-Carpenter (1952): Historical no-slip method, high-rate dispersed flow

Spreadsheet Preview

55 rows x 3 columns

How to use this blueprint
  1. In Excel, go to the Petroleum Office ribbon tab and click Blueprint Manager
  2. Search for Multiphase Correlation Comparison
  3. Click on the blueprint to preview the spreadsheet template
  4. Click Insert to place it into your worksheet. Modify the input values to match your data.
Tags:
vlpbeggs-brillgrayhagedorn-brownansarihasan-kabirmukherjee-brillorkiszewskiduns-rosazizpoettmann-carpentercomparisonmultiphase

Need a custom calculation? Request a Blueprint

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X