Choke Sizing Comparison


Spreadsheet

17 rows x 3 columns

fx
A B C
1 Choke Sizing Comparison
2 Well Production Data
3 Wellhead Pressure 500 psia
4 Target Liquid Rate 800 bbl/d
5 Gas-Liquid Ratio (GLR) 600 scf/bbl
6
7 Choke Sizing Results
8 Correlation Choke Size (in) Calculated Rate (bbl/d)
9 Gilbert (1954) 0.4302852312 800
10 Ros (1960) 0.3260592875 800
11 Baxendell (1957) 0.3930101503 800
12 Achong (1961) 0.3737091007 800
13 Pilehvari (1980) 0.4377061604 800
14
15 Analysis
16 Average Choke Size 0.392153986 in
17 Size Range (Max-Min) 0.1116468729 in

Description

Compare choke diameter sizing using different critical flow correlations (Gilbert, Ros, Baxendell, Achong, Pilehvari).

Design Steps:

  • Input wellhead pressure, target liquid rate, and GLR
  • Calculate required choke size using each correlation
  • Verify flow rate with sized choke
  • Compare results across correlations

Correlation Selection:

  • Gilbert: Most widely used, good starting point
  • Ros: Modified Gilbert coefficients
  • Baxendell: Developed from Lake Maracaibo data
  • Achong: Lake Maracaibo wells, higher GLR
  • Pilehvari: Based on U. of Tulsa experimental data

Reference: Guo, B., Lyons, W.C., Ghalambor, A. (2007). Petroleum Production Engineering.

How to use this blueprint
  1. In Excel, go to the Petroleum Office ribbon tab and click Blueprint Manager
  2. Search for Choke Sizing Comparison
  3. Click on the blueprint to preview the spreadsheet template
  4. Click Insert to place it into your worksheet. Modify the input values to match your data.
Tags:
chokesizingGilbertRosBaxendellachongPilehvaricritical-flow

Need a custom calculation? Request a Blueprint

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X